From: Raymond Manzoni Subject: Re: Gleason's theorem Date: 19 Sep 2000 16:34:39 GMT Newsgroups: sci.physics.research,sci.math.research Summary: [missing] Bernd Hilgenberg wrote: > > Hello , > > can anyone give me a hint how to prove the Gleason's theorem > > There must be a proof in : > Cooke R, Keane M and Moran W 1985 > An elementary proof of Gleason's theorem Math. Proc. Camb. > Phil. Soc. 98 117 - 28 > > but I dont have access to this paper :-( > > thanks > Hello, Perhaps that you could try the paper of Fred Richman and Doublas Briges : 'A Constructive proof of Gleason's theorem' in ps or dvi : http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/R/RichmanF/papers/gleason.ps.Z http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/R/RichmanF/papers/gleason.dvi.Z Hope it helped, Raymond ============================================================================== From: greg@math.ucdavis.edu (Greg Kuperberg) Subject: Re: Gleason's theorem Date: 20 Sep 2000 19:00:03 -0500 Newsgroups: sci.physics.research,sci.math.research In article <39C8DD13.773DCE9D@chardonnay.math.bme.hu>, SZABO Sandor wrote: >> Perhaps that you could try the paper of Fred Richman and Doublas >> Briges : 'A Constructive proof of Gleason's theorem' in ps or dvi : >> >> http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/R/RichmanF/papers/gleason.ps.Z >> http://hypatia.dcs.qmw.ac.uk/authors/R/RichmanF/papers/gleason.dvi.Z >It does not help! >Hypatia: access forbidden! > Sandor I'm not sure why Hypatia got into this thread. You can get the papers from Richman's home page: http://www.math.fau.edu/Richman/html/docs.htm Alas, these wonderful papers are not in the arXiv. :-) -- /\ Greg Kuperberg (UC Davis) / \ \ / Visit the Math ArXiv Front at http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/ \/ * All the math that's fit to e-print * ============================================================================== From: George Jones Subject: Re: Gleason's theorem Date: 19 Sep 2000 16:34:59 GMT Newsgroups: sci.physics.research,sci.math.research In article <39C624EF.776DE4E6@de.bosch.com>, Bernd Hilgenberg wrote: > Hello , > > can anyone give me a hint how to prove the Gleason's theorem > > There must be a proof in : > Cooke R, Keane M and Moran W 1985 > An elementary proof of Gleason's theorem Math. Proc. Camb. > Phil. Soc. 98 117 - 28 > > but I dont have access to this paper :-( This paper, along with a commentary by R.I.G. Hughes, is reproduced verbatim as appendix A of his book "The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics." I realize that this may not help much. I love the last sentence in the preface of this book: "Having thus outlined my program and declared my allegiances, I leave the reader to decide whether to proceed further, or to open another beer, or both." Regards, George