From: Ronald Bruck Subject: Re: [Q]: minimum of a convex function on a convex set of a banach space Date: 17 Sep 2000 14:00:08 -0500 Newsgroups: sci.math.research Summary: [missing] In article <8q0t95$5g9@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>, kovarik@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (Zdislav V. Kovarik) wrote: :In article <8pra8c$198d@edrn.newsguy.com>, :Humberto Jose Bortolossi wrote: ::Greetings! :: ::Let U a convex set of a banach space B and f: U -> R a convex ::function defined on U. I would like to know what conditions to ::impose on U (closed? bounded?) in order to make sure that f has a ::minimum on U. :: ::Any references? : :A classic: :David G. Luenberger: Optimization by Vector Space Methods :John Wiley & Sons 1969 :ISBN 471-55359x : :Hope it helps, ZVK(Slavek). I don't remember off the top of my head, but does Luenberger discuss GENERAL convex functions in infinite-dimensional Banach spaces? Anyway, the usual conditions: U non-empty, convex, and weakly compact; f proper (i.e. not identically +\infty), convex, lower semi-continuous; ==> f assumes a minimum. To get weak compactness one usually works in a REFLEXIVE Banach space, where U closed and convex (and nonempty) suffices. You can allow U to be unbounded if you put a growth condition on f (e.g. f(x) --> +\infty as ||x||--> +\infty), but these are just variants of the bounded case. And, of course, if x0 is a minimizer of f then 0 \in \partial f(x0), the subdifferential of f at x0. I would suggest getting a copy of Moreau's lecture notes. --Ron Bruck -- Due to University fiscal constraints, .sigs may not be exceed one line. ============================================================================== From: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel) Subject: Re: [Q]: minimum of a convex function on a convex set of a banach space Date: 17 Sep 2000 14:00:02 -0500 Newsgroups: sci.math.research In article <8pra8c$198d@edrn.newsguy.com>, Humberto Jose Bortolossi wrote: >Let U a convex set of a banach space B and f: U -> R a convex >function defined >on U. I would like to know what conditions to impose on U >(closed? bounded?) in >order to make sure that f has a minimum on U. It's not true in general, even if f is linear and U is a closed ball. I think you'll want U to be compact in some topology in which f is lower semicontinuous. Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2