From: baez@galaxy.ucr.edu (John Baez) Subject: Re: Expansion of the Universe and Ionization Date: 11 Aug 2000 22:12:44 GMT Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research Summary: [missing] In article , Paul Lutus wrote: >Ted Bunn wrote: >> If the Universe keeps expanding forever, then the probability is >> essentially zero. Black holes in different galaxy clusters are >> currently moving away from each other due to the expansion, >This is a common misconception about universal expansion. The universe is >expanding, but this does not mean individual galaxies, or even clusters of >galaxies, are also expanding. They are gravitationally bound. Therefore as >time passes there is plenty of opportunity for black holes to merge within >or between galaxies. Despite your reference to "misconceptions", nothing you wrote contradicts what Ted said. He explicitly referred to black holes in DIFFERENT GALAXY CLUSTERS. While individual clusters are gravitationally bound, different clusters move away from each other. This sets an upper limit on how big black holes will get: the mass of a cluster is about 10^14 solar masses, so we can't expect black holes to get bigger than that. But this is probably an extreme overestimate. Even though galaxies and clusters are "gravitationally bound" in the technical sense of having total negative potential energy exceeding the total positive kinetic energy (in the Newtonian approximation), individual stars will still "boil off" as time progresses, thanks to randomly managing to acquire enough kinetic energy to achieve escape velocity. People have done computer simulations of this process. And in the long run (about 10^19 years) it's estimated that about 90% the stars will boil off the galaxies in this manner. Of these, I suspect a hefty fraction will also boil off the clusters (the timescale being about 10^23 years). These stars are unlikely to fall into black holes. For the same reason, we can't expect all the black holes in a given cluster to form a single humongous black hole. Many will boil off. In brief: some stuff falls down, but the resulting decrease in potential energy means that *other* stuff must get a lot of kinetic energy and shoot off. These two processes are inseparable.