From: renfrod@central.edu (Dave L. Renfro) Subject: "How bad can 2^(Aleph_0) be?" history question Date: 27 May 2001 22:59:47 -0400 Newsgroups: sci.math Paul Cohen proved that 2^(Aleph_0) =/= Aleph_1 is consistent with ZFC in 1963. [Kanamori, "The Higher Infinite", p. 114, says that Cohen circulated notes for the proof in April 1963.] I am interested in who, when, and where (seminar presentation, published paper, etc.) proved the stronger result that it is consistent with ZFC that 2^(Aleph_0) can be any specified cardinal whose cofinality is greater than Aleph_0. I know that stronger results were proved by Richard Soloay and William Easton, but I'm only interested in the possibilities for 2^(Aleph_0). I think maybe this was proved independently by Cohen and Solovay. In abstract 63T-395 on page 595 of the Oct. 1963 Notices of the American Mathematical Society (dated Sept. 3, 1963), Solovay writes "(The first was discovered independently by Cohen.)" in reference to the fact that 2^(Aleph_0) can be any cardinal with cofinality greater than Aleph_0. That Cohen proved this appears to be confirmed by Lemma 16 on page 49 of his paper "Independence results in set theory", which appears in John W. Addison, Leon Henkin, and Alfred Tarski, "The Theory of Models", Proceedings of the 1963 International Symposium at Berkeley, North-Holland, 1965. However, Cohen mentions a result of Solovay's [Not the result that I'm interested in, but rather that 2^(Aleph_n) = Aleph_g(n) can be satisfied simultaneously for all positive integers n in some model for ZFC, where g is any specified strictly increasing function from the positive integers into the positive integers.] as well as a result *later* announced by Easton. Because of this, I would guess that Cohen wrote this paper well after his Berkeley talk, and so not all of the results mentioned in it may have been presented at the Berkeley conference (in particular, Cohen's Lemma 16 that I mentioned above). Can someone tell me what dates this conference took place? I forgot to write this down when I was photocopying this stuff yesterday and the library I was at is a 160 mile round-trip drive. Also, does anyone know whether or not Cohen had actually proved the result I'm interested in--that 2^(Aleph_0) can be any cardinal with uncountable cofinality--when this conference took place? If not, when did Cohen obtain it? Dave L. Renfro