From: rgep@dpmms.cam.ac.uk (Richard Pinch) Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: polynomials can't give only primes - sci.math #54025 Date: 6 Sep 1996 11:05:30 GMT In article <50odl2$ecr@nuscc.nus.sg>, sci50090@leonis.nus.sg (VeLaGaMist) writes: |> In anycase, it has been proved that there is indeed an integral |> polynomial that gives primes whenever it takes positive values. |> |> I do not have an idea of the explicit form of the polynomial. Could |> anyone enlighten me on this? Accoring to my notes, it is (k+2){1-([wz+h+j-q]^2 + [(gk+2g+k+1)(h+j)+h-z]^2 + [16(k+1)^3 (k+2) (n+1)^2 +1-f^2]^2 + [ 2n+p+q+z-e ]^2 + [ e^3 (e+2)(a+1)^2 + 1 - o^2]^2 + [(a^2-1)y^2 + 1 - x^2]^2 + [16r^2 y^4 (a^2-1) + 1-u^2]^2 + [ ( (a+u^2 (u^2-a))^2 - 1 ) (n+4dy)^2 + 1 - (x+cu)^2]^2 + [(a^2-1)l^2 + 1 - m^2]^2 + [ai+k+1-l-i]^2 + [n+l+v-y]^2 + [p+l(a-n-1)+b(2an+2a-n^2-2n-2)-m]^2 + [q+y(a-p-1)+s(2ap+2a-p^2-2p-2)-x]^2 + [z+pl(a-p)+t(2ap-p^2-1)-pm]^2 ) } (the layout may help show why it is not of much practical use!). See J.Am.Math.Soc., 6/1976, pp449-464. -- Richard Pinch Queens' College, Cambridge rgep@cam.ac.uk http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~rgep ============================================================================== For a readable exposition of the development of these ideas see Math Reviews v. 54 #2615 10M05 (10B15 02F99) Jones, James P.; Sato, Daihachiro; Wada, Hideo; Wiens, Douglas Diophantine representation of the set of prime numbers. Amer. Math. Monthly 83 (1976), no. 6, 449--464. Since Ju. V. Matijasevic showed that every recursively enumerable set is Diophantine, several authors have given polynomials that represent the prime numbers. This well-written paper contains two such polynomials: one of degree 25 in 26 variables, the other of high degree in just 12 variables. It also contains some general results on representation of sets of integers. Perhaps the most interesting result is: Any algebraic function with only integer values must be a polynomial. © Copyright American Mathematical Society 1994, 1998