From: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel) Subject: Re: Variance of max(X,Y) Date: 30 Dec 1999 19:19:21 GMT Newsgroups: sci.math In article <386638FF.74170B13@vguard.com>, Isak Levinson wrote: >I'd like to know the Variance of max(X,Y). >what is the relation to Var(X), Var(Y). >I suspect that it should be less than max(Var(X), Var(Y)). No, it isn't. For example, consider a probability space with three outcomes: 1) with probability p has X = 1/p, Y = 0 2) with probability p has X = 0, Y = 1/p 3) with probability 1-2p has X=Y=0 (where p is small and positive). Then Var(X) = Var(Y) = 1/p^2 - 1, but Var(max(X,Y)) = 2/p^2 - 4. What you can say is that Var(max(X,Y)) <= Var(X) + Var(Y), and this example shows that estimate is essentially the best possible. Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 ============================================================================== From: israel@math.ubc.ca (Robert Israel) Subject: Re: Variance of max(X,Y) Date: 30 Dec 1999 21:55:56 GMT Newsgroups: sci.math In article <84gb7p$jlq$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca>, Robert Israel wrote: > What you can say is that >Var(max(X,Y)) <= Var(X) + Var(Y), and this example shows that >estimate is essentially the best possible. Actually there is an improvement possible: Var(max(X,Y)) + Var(min(X,Y)) <= Var(X) + Var(Y) Does this inequality have a name? Robert Israel israel@math.ubc.ca Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2